Pascal and Francis Bibliographic Databases

Help

Search results

Your search

kw.\*:("DETECTION MENSONGE")

Filter

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Document Type [dt]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Publication Year[py]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Discipline (document) [di]

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Language

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Author Country

A-Z Z-A Frequency ↓ Frequency ↑
Export in CSV

Results 1 to 25 of 494

  • Page / 20
Export

Selection :

  • and

LE DETECTEUR DE MENSONGE AU MOYEN DU SPECTRO-PHONOELECTROCARDIOGRAMMECIOFU I.1972; REV. PSIHOL.; ROMAN.; DA. 1972; VOL. 18; NO 4; PP. 453-460; ABS. ANGL.Article

LIE SCALE AND ATTITUDINAL CHANGE OF QUESTIONNAIRE'S SCOREKIKUCHI T.1974; TOHOKU PSYCHOL. FOLIA; JAP.; DA. 1974; VOL. 33; NO 1-4; PP. 62-70; BIBL. 4REF.Article

PSYCHOLOGY AND THE LIE DETECTOR INDUSTRYLYKKEN DT.1974; AMER. PSYCHOLOGIST; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 29; NO 10; PP. 725-739; BIBL. 17REF.Article

THE OBJECTIVE USE OF MULTIPLE PHYSIOLOGICAL INDICES IN THE DETECTION OF DECEPTION = L'UTILISATION OBJECTIVE D'INDICES PHYSIOLOGIQUES MULTIPLES DANS LA DETECTION DE TROMPERIECUTROW RJ; PARKS A; LUCAS N et al.1972; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 9; NO 6; PP. 578-588; BIBL. 1 P.Article

THE INFLUENCE OF AUXILIARY SOURCES OF INFORMATION IN POLYGRAPH DIAGNOSES.WICKLANDER DE; HUNTER FL.1975; J. POLICE SCI. ADMINISTR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 405-409Article

THE SPECIFIC CONCERN TEST FOR THE DETECTION OF DECEPTIONGWYNNE JL.1974; J. POLICE SCI. ADMINISTR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 2; NO 1; PP. 38-39; BIBL. 3REFArticle

DETECTION OF SUPPRESSED INVOLVEMENT WITH INFORMATION THROUGH A FORCED NUMBER-GUESSING TECHNIQUE = DETECTION DE LA DISSIMULATION D'INFORMATION AU MOYEN D'UNE TECHNIQUE D'ESTIMATION FORCEE DE NOMBRELIEBLICH I; NINIO A.1972; ACTA PSYCHOL.; PAYS-BAS; DA. 1972; VOL. 36; NO 5; PP. 381-387; BIBL. 4REF.Article

THE PSYCHOPATH AND THE LIE DETECTOR.LYKKEN DT.1978; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 137-142; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGH LIE SCORERS.KIRTON M.1977; PSYCHOL. REP.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 40; NO 1; PP. 279-280; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF SELECTED VARIABLES ON INTERPRETATION OF POLYGRAPH RECORDS.HORVATH F.1977; J. APPL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 62; NO 2; PP. 127-136; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

LEARNING THE APPLICANT'S BACKGROUND THROUGH CONFIDENTIAL INVESTIGATIONS.BOGERT J.1976; PERSONNEL J.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 55; NO 6; PP. 272Article

THE VALIDITY OF THE POLYGRAPH TECHNIQUE WITH CHILDREN.ABRAMS S.1975; J. POLICE SCI. ADMINISTR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 310-311; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

STATISTICAL VERSUS CLINICAL LIE DETECTIONSZUCKO JJ; KLEINMUNTZ B.1981; AM. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0003-066X; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 36; NO 5; PP. 488-496; BIBL. 41 REF.Article

EYE CONTACT WHILE LYING DURING AN INTERVIEW.BURNS JA; KINTZ BL.1976; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 7; NO 1; PP. 87-89; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

LYING BEHAVIOR AND EVALUATION OF LIES.MAIER LA; LAVRAKAS PJ.1976; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 42; NO 2; PP. 575-581; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

ACCURACY OF THE POLYGRAPH TECHNIQUE WITH AND WITHOUT CARD TEST STIMULATION.SENESE L.1976; J. POLICE SCI. ADMINISTR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 274-276; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

RELATIVE ACCURACY OF POLYGRAPH EXAMINER DIAGNOSIS OF RESPIRATION, BLOOD PRESSURE, AND GSR RECORDINGS.SLOWIK SM; BUCKLEY JP.1975; J. POLICE SCI. ADMINISTR.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 3; PP. 305-309; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

EXTRAVERSION AND THE DETECTION OF DECEPTION: COMMENTS ON THE PAPER BY BRADLEY AND JANISSEGUDJONSSON GH.1982; PERS. INDIVID. DIFFER.; ISSN 0191-8869; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 3; NO 2; PP. 215-216; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

HUMANS AS LIE DETECTORS: SOME SECOND THOUGHTSKRAUT R; DEPAULO BM; ZUCKERMAN M et al.1980; J. COMMUN.; ISSN 0021-9916; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 30; NO 4; PP. 209-218; BIBL. DISSEM.Article

PROBLEMES CHOISIS DES ETUDES EXPERIMENTALES SUR LA "DETECTION DU MENSONGE"WIDACKI J; MOTYKA M; ZELECHOWSKA RZEPKA U et al.1977; PRZEGL. PSYCHOL.; POLSKA; DA. 1977; VOL. 20; NO 3; PP. 483-489; ABS. ANGL. RUSSE; BIBL. 1 P. 1/2Article

NONVERBAL STRATEGIES FOR DECODING DECEPTIONZUCKERMAN M; SPIEGEL NH; DEPAULO BM et al.1982; J. NONVERBAL BEHAV.; ISSN 0191-5886; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 6; NO 3; PP. 171-187; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENT OF THE ACCURACY OF DETECTION OF DECEPTION: A REPLY TO LIKKEN.RASKIN DC.1978; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1978; VOL. 15; NO 2; PP. 143-147; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

LYING ON A TEST AND IN THE LABORATORY.KINTZ BL.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 2; PP. 207-209; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

AN EVALUATION OF FIELD TECHNIQUES IN DETECTION OF DECEPTION. = UNE EVALUATION DES TECHNIQUES SUR LE TERRAIN DANS LA DETECTION DE LA FRAUDEBARLAND GH; RASKIN DC.1975; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 12; NO 3; PP. 321-330; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

DE LA DIFFICULTE A MENTIR. ETUDE PHENOMENOLOGIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE.DURANDIN G.sdBRUXELLES; NAUWELAERTS; DA. S.D.; PP. 1-117; BIBL. 3 P.; (PUBL. SORBONNE, SER. NS RECH. 23)Book

  • Page / 20